Re: OT: Recommendations for point-to-point device

I've used Rukus for point to multipoint bridging and it works great here in
Chicago with equally harsh winds and sub freezing weather . Have a look at
their website.

http://www.ruckuswireless.com/

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

( please excuse the brevity of this email as it was sent via a mobile device.
Please excuse misspelled words or sentence structure.)

On Dec 19, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Charlie_CA <spycharlies_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I wish it was, but currently Fiber is not an option because the complexes
> (trailers units) are only temporary and can move from one location to
> another in the massive yard. I have had discussions on lighting up the
> whole yard with Cisco 1550 outdoor waps, but that may be in the future. my
> temporary solution is to look for a reliable p-t-p device that can supply
> connectivity to the trailers. Thanks guys!
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Marko Milivojevic
<markom_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>
>> Why not? I mean, it's not like local city code's going to prevent it :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jeremy Counter <jcounter_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> In the Oil Fields above the arctic circle, they run fiber.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/19/12 Dec 19 1:10 PM, "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is pulling the fiber not an option?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Charlie_CA <spycharlies_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Experts,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone recommend a tested, trusted and longterm operational
>>>>> point-to-point device for interconnecting Cisco switches in a cold and
>>>>> windy terrain (say -45degrees)? no I don t live in Artic! I live in
>>>>> Western Canada..and that s how we roll here, haha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically, I am connecting multiple temporary complexes with a clear
>>>>> line
>>>>> of sight, about 400ft apart. I m currently using a product called
>> Exalts
>>>>> Extend Air which was recommended to us by Cisco. On a good day it works
>>>>> perfect, other days it works poorly that the only way to get
>>>>> connectivity
>>>>> is to reduce the Throughput to 6.5Mbps each way (QPSK Mode at 8MHz
>>>>> Bandwidth).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Moving forward, I need something that is reliable, less susceptible to
>>>>> interference and just works! Cost is not an issue.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any recommendations will be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks guys!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Charlie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 19 2012 - 22:10:11 ART