Re: OT: Recommendations for point-to-point device

Laser-based ones probably won't work in strong winds and snow.
Radio-based ones may work, but the problem will be with heavy
snowfall. It's a no-win ;-)

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Charlie_CA <spycharlies_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I wish it was, but currently Fiber is not an option because the complexes
> (trailers units) are only temporary and can move from one location to
> another in the massive yard. I have had discussions on lighting up the whole
> yard with Cisco 1550 outdoor waps, but that may be in the future. my
> temporary solution is to look for a reliable p-t-p device that can supply
> connectivity to the trailers. Thanks guys!
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Why not? I mean, it's not like local city code's going to prevent it :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jeremy Counter <jcounter_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > In the Oil Fields above the arctic circle, they run fiber.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12/19/12 Dec 19 1:10 PM, "Marko Milivojevic" <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>Is pulling the fiber not an option?
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> >>Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>> >>
>> >>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Charlie_CA <spycharlies_at_gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi Experts,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Can someone recommend a tested, trusted and longterm operational
>> >>> point-to-point device for interconnecting Cisco switches in a cold
>> >>> and
>> >>> windy terrain (say -45degrees)? no I don t live in Artic! I live in
>> >>> Western Canada..and that s how we roll here, haha
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Basically, I am connecting multiple temporary complexes with a clear
>> >>>line
>> >>> of sight, about 400ft apart. I m currently using a product called
>> >>> Exalts
>> >>> Extend Air which was recommended to us by Cisco. On a good day it
>> >>> works
>> >>> perfect, other days it works poorly that the only way to get
>> >>>connectivity
>> >>> is to reduce the Throughput to 6.5Mbps each way (QPSK Mode at 8MHz
>> >>> Bandwidth).
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Moving forward, I need something that is reliable, less susceptible to
>> >>> interference and just works! Cost is not an issue.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Any recommendations will be appreciated.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks guys!
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Charlie
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>_______________________________________________________________________
>> >>Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 19 2012 - 15:32:38 ART