Re: LLQ- help

From: Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 01:04:55 -0800

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> The priority Queue would drop traffic prior to congesting the link due to
> very high burst in a very small period of time.

Paul, this is why I called your test flawed. This *was* a congestion.
Nothing personal in calling a test flawed. I've seen (and done) many
of those. I particularly like statements "my interface is not
congested, here take a look at the daily graphs with 5-minute sampling
intervals". I remember making a lot of money out of that one for my
previous employer.

When analyzing QoS, one needs to dig very deep to the fundamentals how
IOS operates. Congestion is a state that can happen many times during
one second... :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Dec 19 2012 - 01:04:55 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 01 2013 - 09:36:53 ART