Re: LLQ- help

How does this relate to LLQ? :-)

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> It depends on what code you are talking about. The Priority Q used to default
> to 30 ms burst rate which would allow to ONLY burst to 30 ms of traffic above
> the Priority rate. It's really not a Queue. I tested this with real Voice and
> Video  traffic a while back and it limited the calls/traffic with NO other
> traffic being used by other classes. The default policer in the Priority Q
> would default to a very very low burst rate and drop traffic even when the
> pipe was not filled.
>
>
> Paul Negron
> CCIE# 14856
> negron.paul_at_gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:15 AM, dia.aliou_at_gmail.com wrote:
>
>> As Carlos said, with only "priority percent 10", 10 percent of the
>> bandwidth is reserved for this class, however if there is available
>> bandwidth and the there is no congestion this class could use more than
>> 10%. To enforce the reserved bandwidth to 10% you need to explicitly police
>> the traffic.
>>
>>
>> On 16 December 2012 13:26, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> wrote:
>>
>>> Janesh,
>>> implicit policing by the "priority" QPF command is done only when
>>> congestion is present and queueing control "engaged".
>>>
>>> If you want to restrict the stream at all times, explicit policing with
>>> "police" is needed.
>>>
>>> -Carlos
>>>
>>> janesh gs @ 16/12/2012 09:55 -0300 dixit:
>>>
>>> Hello there,
>>>>
>>>> Could someone please  explain the pros/cons of the following 2
>>>> configuration options in a single policy-map scenario.
>>>>  Also where we will use one over the other in real life
>>>>
>>>> Option 1
>>>> --------------
>>>> policy-map BLAH
>>>> class BLAH
>>>> priority percent 10
>>>> police cir percent 10
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Option 2
>>>> --------------
>>>> policy-map BLAH
>>>> class BLAH
>>>> priority percent 10
>>>>
>>>> All along I have been  sticking to Option 2.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> Janesh
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>> ___________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>
> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/
> CCIELab.html>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>> ___________
>>> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>>> list/CCIELab.html <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net