Re: spanning-tree port-priority

Ah but if you apply both priority and cost which one wins?

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 11:54 AM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Speaking from the switch perspective, we make change on a switch
> upstream that influences the election of the upstream interfaces on
> current switch.
>
> Marc
>
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:51 AM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > When we talk upstream/downstream, the way I envision is like river.
> > the source of the stream is up. So root would be upstream.
> >
> > You are right that it is downstream interface from that definition.
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:16 AM, dia.aliou_at_gmail.com <dia.aliou_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The way I remember it easilu is: apply port priority on a port going
> away of
> >> the root bridge (downstream) and use port cost on the port going toward
> the
> >> root bridge.
> >>
> >> HTH
> >>
> >> Aliou
> >>
> >> On 9 Dec 2012 15:58, "marc edwards" <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I forgot something and hope this doesn't confuse things.... port
> >> priority has to be upstream of root (or blocked) port and is used to
> >> influence the election of the root port on downstream device. HTH
> >> clarify a little more.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Marc
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:18 AM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> It has to be applied on...
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Marc Abel
CCIE #35470
(Routing and Switching)
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net