Re: Cisco IOS Content Filtering

FYI

Scansafe has been rebranded to Cisco Web Security

http://www.cisco.com/web/products/security/cloud_web/index.html

both cloud and on premises options

Regards,

Marc

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Cisco Fanatic
<ebay_products_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Marc, Guilherme and Lindsay ...
>
>> Subject: Re: Cisco IOS Content Filtering
>> From: lindsay.k.hill_at_gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:42:05 +1300
>> CC: renorider_at_gmail.com; ebay_products_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>> To: glwgoes_at_gmail.com
>
>>
>> Yeah, ScanSafe seems to be the way to go now. Check out the writeup
>> @mengelm did about it at Packetpushers:
>>
>>
>> http://packetpushers.net/scansafe-saas-content-filtering-evaluation-setup-on-cisco-isr-g2/
>>
>> Marc's right about being able to get around content filters, but it's not
>> always about trying to stop EVERYTHING - it's just about catching MOST
>> things.
>>
>> Personally I like having content filtering that uses a different A/V to
>> the one run on my desktops. Gives better coverage. For what A/V is worth
>> anyway (not much).
>>
>> Reporting is very handy too, being able to see how bandwidth is being
>> used.
>>
>> On 27/11/2012, at 1:04 PM, Guilherme Loch Waltrick Gses
>> <glwgoes_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I believe this has been put on EoL. The current solution for Web
>> > Filtering
>> > on routers is using the ISR connector to the Cisco Cloud Web Security
>> > (former ScanSafe) service.
>> >
>> > Guilherme Loch Gses
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:44 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Looks like an Ironport for small/medium size business. It is aimed
>> >> more at ensuring web content is w/in realm of organization acceptable
>> >> use. I don't believe this will have much positive impact for zero day
>> >> threats, worms, viruses, etc...
>> >>
>> >> Also w/respect to web content filters... there is always a web proxy
>> >> to get around a web filter ;) Really cat vs. dog game and we don't
>> >> know who is doing the chasing.
>> >>
>> >> Marc
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Cisco Fanatic
>> >> <ebay_products_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> ALL -
>> >>> What's your opinion on this? Can this be deployed as a
>> >> preventative/protection
>> >>> mechanism?
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6643/prod
>> >>> _qas0900aecd804abb06.html
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Nov 27 2012 - 10:48:13 ART