Re: MPLS TE RSVP bandwidth delim

From: MSDP multicast <multicast100_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:11:20 +1100

Carlos,
Looks like you're having bad day today.
Where do you think my question is aligned with marketing?

You think about it - 2 x RSVP TE tunnels asymmetric 2 MB in each direction
do your basic maths and then tell me what it adds up to?

Keep it technical if possible, there is always an alternate if you don't
like my posting. chuck it in the rubbish bin.

You should be ashamed by yourself - you typed a paragraph of rubbish but if
you know the answer why didn't you write answer instead?

-noname! bugger you...

On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>wrote:

> MSDP,
> do you work for the marketing department ? Your view implies that a cat 6
> patch has a bandwidth of 2 Gbps! Which is inline with most marketing blufs
> about switching capacity :)
> Lack of identity also helps. What's the problem with a having a name ?
> -Carlos
>
>
> MSDP multicast @ 25/11/2012 00:02 -0300 dixit:
>
> Thanks Yuri,
>> Does that mean customer can pull 4 mb in total (2tx and 2rx).
>>
>> How do we control this so customer only gets 2 MB. what is the best
>> practice?
>>
>> One place that SP can control is on the SP edge using policing/shapping.
>> The potencial risk of this approach is when SP forgets policing/shaping.
>> Customer will enjoy 4 megs total bandwidth in this case.
>>
>> -m
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think if a customer buys a 2Mbps circuit, that would imply 2Mbps in
>>> each
>>> direction. RSVP signaled tunnels are unidirectional.
>>>
>>> -Yuri
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 5:55 PM, MSDP multicast <multicast100_at_gmail.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> I got this question bugging me for a while.
>>>>
>>>> R1----------R2-------------R3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Scenario:
>>>> RSVP interface bandwidth: R1,R2,R3=50MB
>>>> A) create a tunnel between R1 to R3 and allocate 2 MB
>>>> B) create a tunnel bandwidth R3 to R1 and allocate 2 MB
>>>>
>>>> Requirement: Customer want 2 MB bandwidth regardless of direction!
>>>>
>>>> Q1: If customer have is paying for 2 MB, in real world what do we
>>>> configure
>>>> tunnels?
>>>> optionA) 1 MB in each direction i.e. tunnel R1 to R3 = 1MB, tunnel R3 to
>>>> R1
>>>> = 1 MB
>>>> optionB) 2 MB in each direction i.e. tunnel R1 to R3 = 2 MB, tunnel R3
>>>> to
>>>> R1 = 2 MB
>>>>
>>>> with option#b - i think a customer will get double bandwidth ! but that
>>>> will ensure 2 MB in any direction.
>>>>
>>>> My understanding for the above option 1# is that - Typical SP will only
>>>> provison 1 MB in each direction.
>>>> However, customer would like to see 2 MB in full either one or both
>>>> direction.
>>>>
>>>> How do we deal with this kind of situation where customer want to see 2
>>>> MB
>>>> in total regardless of direction?
>>>>
>>>> Q2: Are tunnels uni or bi directional?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>>>> ___________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>> ___________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 02:11:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 01 2012 - 07:27:51 ART