RE: Redistribute Connected in BGP

How did this work out?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Brian Dennis
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:05 AM
To: Routing Freak; Cisco certification; ccie_rs
Subject: Re: Redistribute Connected in BGP

If you are advertising an interface into OSPF natively why would the router also allow it to be redistributed into OSPF on the same device?
What would the benefit be of having the same route advertised twice by the same router, once as an intra-area route in OSPF and the other as an external route in OSPF?

--
Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice) bdennis_at_ine.com
INE, Inc.
http://www.INE.com
On 11/9/12 2:22 AM, "Routing Freak" <routingfreak_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi all
>
>I know that when you configure redistribute connected under OSPF or any 
>other routing protocols, the connected interfaces which are running 
>OSPF will be redistributed .
>
>When you do redistribute connected with route-map command, we have to 
>explicitly configure the connected interfaces in the route-map to send.
>
>
>But under BGP, when you configure redistribute connected, i see that 
>all the connected  routes are getting redistributed,
>
>I want to know why it is redistributing all the connected interfaces 
>and not only the connected interface used to reach the neighbor
>
>Is this a issue ?
>
>
>
>router bgp 100
>
>redistribute connected
>
>
>Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net