Re: Redistribute Connected in BGP

Maybe it's too early, but can you give am example? I speak IOS better than word problems (I hope I'm not the only one).

I may be dense this morning, but you are asking why your redist connected under BGP is redistributing all interfaces? Uhhhh....why would you expect it to only redist connected interfaces to peers? Redist connected would be the same as typing out the network/mask of all the connected interfaces. Anything less would require a route map. Again, it's early and I could have misunderstood you. ;)

Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCIE #35355 (RS)
Sent from my iPhone 5

On Nov 9, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> I know that when you configure redistribute connected under OSPF or any
> other routing protocols, the connected interfaces which are running OSPF
> will be redistributed .
>
> When you do redistribute connected with route-map command, we have to
> explicitly configure the connected interfaces in the route-map to send.
>
>
> But under BGP, when you configure redistribute connected, i see that all
> the connected routes are getting redistributed,
>
> I want to know why it is redistributing all the connected interfaces and
> not only the connected interface used to reach the neighbor
>
> Is this a issue ?
>
>
>
> router bgp 100
>
> redistribute connected
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Nov 09 2012 - 06:07:03 ART