Hi Brian,
but from R3 or R2 I 'm not able to reach 1.1.1.1 (R1's l 0 )
you mean that that router can join a group from every interface despite
that interface is not on routing table?
You mean that the join gets to the RP using the reachable interface instead?
Actually this makes a bit more sense to me now..
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com> wrote:
> Why is it not possible?
>
> --
> Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
> bdennis_at_ine.com
>
> INE, Inc.
> http://www.INE.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/5/12 9:14 PM, "ccie99999" <ccie99999_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello everybody.
> >
> >I'm a bit confused about this:
> >
> >I'm testing a minilab:
> >
> >*R1* - 10.0.12.0/24 - *R2* - 10.0.23.0/24 - *R3*
> >
> >R1 is the receiver (ip igmp join 224.1.1.1 on loo 0)
> >R2 is the server (ping 224.1.1.1 rep 100)
> >R3 is the autorp
> >ospf is the igp
> >
> >ok, everything works.
> >if I shutdown the R1 L0 interface the ping stop to reply. OK, fine.
> >but if the R1 L0 is up but not configured to be part of OSPF process the
> >ping to 224.1.1.1 is still working and replies come from 10.0.12.1
> >
> >(already cleared ospf and ip mroute *)
> >
> >I don't get how this is possible.. someone can explain this?
> >
> >thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >@ccie99999
> >
> >
> >Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-- @ccie99999 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Nov 06 2012 - 06:50:00 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 01 2012 - 07:27:50 ART