dial-peers are versatile in that they can function both as incoming or
outgoing.
One reason for that is that once you define an outgoing dp (a dp that is
mainly designed to be used as outgoing) for a given destination-pattern,
it duals as incoming dp for calls coming from the given pattern numbers.
But may be you need some other configuration for such incoming calls. In
that case, answer-address takes precedence with the same semantics
(calling number) and even more precedence is given to incoming
called-number, which matches called number.
A very good reason to use incoming called-number in a catch all dp is to
avoid the possibility of fraud, given that a dp with no cor list
is enabled to call everywhere...
HTH,
-Carlos
Iam Here @ 05/11/2012 19:37 -0300 dixit:
> I am very confused about the difference between destination-pattern and incoming called-number like in the example before
> I read the Cisco Doc that said that incoming called-number to match the incoming call leg to an inbound dial peer
> and destination-patternto match the Called number (DNIS) strings for outbound
>
> dial-peer voice 1 voip
> destination-pattern 4...
> session target rasincoming called-number 4...
>
> I hope if anyone help me to understand the difference in that example
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Nov 06 2012 - 08:14:55 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 01 2012 - 07:27:50 ART