Whether Cisco is big in DWDM space or not is one conversation to have, but
could you guys share with me what type of materials you used to study
topics like DWDM, ATM or SONET for the CCIE SP written test? I know that
these topics can be very deep in the amount of complexity and information.
Thanks everyone,
Tom
**
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:05 AM, John Gitau <jgitau_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> most of our clients run Cisco dwdm/optical gear
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 25 Oct 2012, at 11:11, Shaughn <maniac.smg_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Cisco are big in the DWDM/Optical space. I have worked with very large
> ISP's running Cisco in that layer of the network.
> >
> > CCIE # 23962 (SP)
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 25 Oct 2012, at 9:54 AM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Everyone says that Cisco will eventually release some kind of
> >> virtualized platform for IOS-XR, but I don't see it happening. Hell,
> >> even the versions of L3/L2IOU that are floating around were *not*
> >> officially released by Cisco. I think if anything, they will go
> >> towards a hosted solution, similar to Junosphere, which kind of sucks
> >> because I really like having my own lab to tinker with.
> >>
> >> Dynamips running c7200s can do a lot of the technologies, so using it
> >> learn the theory and fundamental configurations makes a lot of sense.
> >> I think this is what most people are doing.
> >>
> >> I didn't think Cisco was big in the DWDM/SONET market (I've seen ISPs
> >> running Fujitsu, Infinera, and Alcalu for optical transport but never
> >> Cisco). I think the material on that subject would be minimal. All
> >> very much theory based.
> >>
> >> -Yuri
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> Hi Yuri,
> >>> Good to hear from you. Looking over the written and lab requirements,
> there
> >>> seems to be some differences. Written seems to have a lot more of
> things
> >>> like SONET, DWDM, ATM along with the MPLS and IGP. What have you used
> for
> >>> these topics (SONET, DWDM, ATM)? The IS-IS books looks good, will have
> to
> >>> check it out. I just got the MPLS book and started reading "Traffic
> >>> Engineering with MPLS" by Eric Osborne.
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking that learning the theory and implementing it on IOS would
> take
> >>> significant time. Then applying that same knowledge to XR might not be
> as
> >>> hard. I'm not sure if that makes much sense without knowing XR that
> much,
> >>> but I would think that most of the features are similar with some new
> >>> additional ones first implemented on the XR line. Anyone agree or
> disagree?
> >>>
> >>> How are the rumors of virtualized XR platform? Any development there?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Tom Kacprzynski
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Yuri Bank <yuribank_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey Tom,
> >>>>
> >>>> I've glanced over some of INE's material, and it looks pretty good.
> >>>> However, workbooks are not the real concern, it's the lab equipment!
> >>>> Anyways, I think studying for the CCIE-SP is no different from the
> >>>> R&S. *Start with the theory*
> >>>> At least that is what I've been doing. I just finished reading 'OSPF:
> >>>> Anatomy of an Internet Routing Protocol' and 'MPLS Enabled
> >>>> Applications'.
> >>>> 'The Complete IS-IS Routing Protocol' Is next on my list.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Yuri
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:31 PM, HEMANTH RAJ <hemanthrj_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Tom
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was also with the same confusion as like you after finishing my
> R&S.
> >>>>> But
> >>>>> now after purchasing Narbik Workbooks and INE materials for CCIE
> SPV3. I
> >>>>> felt they have covered the blueprint extensively. So i would
> recommend
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> go for Narbik and INE WB if you want to pursue your SPV3.
> >>>>> I am doing the same right now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>> Now that I'm done with CCIE R&S, there is a void in my evenings, no
> >>>>>> more
> >>>>>> date-nights with R1 and SW2 (oh memories) or practice labs. So I was
> >>>>>> thinking of looking at the CCIE Service Provider. I wanted to get
> some
> >>>>>> feedback from people that did their RS and moved on to the Service
> >>>>>> Provider
> >>>>>> track. From my initial research I'm noticing that workbooks don't
> seem
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> be comprehensive as with RS, by that I mean not all topics are
> covered
> >>>>>> in
> >>>>>> them (I could be wrong). Is that partly due to the hardware
> >>>>>> requirements?
> >>>>>> What sort of major difference did you noticed studying SPv3 vs RS in
> >>>>>> terms
> >>>>>> of materials and preparation?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tom Kacprzynski
> >>>>>> CCIE#36159
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Problems arise because we talk,problems are not solved because we
> don't
> >>>>> talk So good or bad talk to your affectionate one's freely.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yours Friendly,
> >>>>> H P HEMANTH RAJ
> >>>>> CCIE#28593 (R&S)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 25 2012 - 10:53:45 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 01 2012 - 10:53:34 ART