Re: forward protocol + dhcp helper address

From: Adam Booth <adam.booth_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 07:51:33 +1000

Hi Imran,

As usual with the CCIE, the documentation is important but then validation
on your own kit to ensure that it's in alignment with reality.

"ip forward-protocol udp" appears to be less important these days and may
be a carry over from config examples based on older IOS versions

Looking in the 12.4T config guide for DHCP Relay Agent at
www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipaddr_dhcp/configuration/12-4t/config-dhcp-relay-agent.htm

The thing about ip forward-protocol udp is you can send broadcasts for
other protocols over a routed network as well which may or may not be
useful and you may wish to "no ip forward-protocol udp xxx" for default
services you don't want sent beyond the LAN segment (though within the
scope of the R&S exam this may be overkill)

Cheers,
Adam

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Imran Ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> ip helper-address <dhcp server ip> works fine if the dhcp server is
> remote
>
> however i m not sure ...why some examples show
>
> ip forward-protocol udp + ip helper-address <dhcp server ip>
>
>
> what is the difference i get if i include " ip forward-protocol udp
> " along with " ip helper-address <dhcp server ip> "
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Oct 25 2012 - 07:51:33 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 01 2012 - 10:53:33 ART