Re: PBR on 6509 cpu utilization

Yes, this is just a temp solution while we migrate a /18 from one network
to another, but keep all ip's reachable and advertiesed from a specific
point, but seperate from the default route.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
<joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:

> PBR is not an enterprise or a high performance technology. At best it's a
> CPU drive stop gap to an outage or other very short term fix.
>
> I suggest you look at designing around needing PBR either through VRF-Lite
> or some other upstream technology such as a 3 legged low latency firewall,
> like Palo Alto.
>
> thanks
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> me you
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 3:13 PM
> To: CCIE GroupStudy
> Subject: PBR on 6509 cpu utilization
>
> Does anyone have experience running PBR on a 6509 sup 2 or sup 720. I
> would like to run PBR but one of the reason not to run it is because it
> will spike the CPU. Is there any validaly behind that claim? Is there any
> cisco doc's that would list the case examples. I tried google but did not
> find anything usefull. Our current CPU is 3% with a 1Gig uplink. I don't
> see how it will increase the CPU that much. I think it is just B/S because
> people are afraid of change.
>
> Thanks
> Rob
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Oct 09 2012 - 15:27:11 ART