RE: IPv6 for Websites

From: Joseph L. Brunner <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:10:09 +0000

"Those customers have a lot of devices, usually 2 of which per site need an IP which cannot be NAT'd, because a direct connection is required for management and billing purposes."

I have vpn's to many sites from ASA 5540's for this purpose... in some places that if I screwed up, you would not have lights in your home :)

I can assure RFC1918 scales to the largest networks in the world.

The IP routing folks want IPv6 because they see billions (ok Trillions) being spent on Iphone, ipads, mac air's and they want their share... it's cool.

The killer app for Networking would be physical connectivity lines that never go down... can we get that and keep our IPv4 space?

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Ratliff
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 1:53 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: IPv6 for Websites

On 9/27/12 4:41 PM, "Joseph L. Brunner" <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com> wrote:

>A lot of people were talking about ipv6 right before 9/11... I bought a
>book with an ipv6 chapter at the Borders at 5 WTC in august 2001. 11
>years later, and ipv4 is still the standard...
>
>Honestly, of the "7 Billion devices" that need internet access how many
>of them need an inbound public IP to receive data? How many can use
>rfc1918 nat without an issue?
>
>There has to be some "killer app" that makes IPv6 a good investment in
>time before companies will invest time in to it. (other than Johnny,
>needs to learn IPv6 on our live network to pass his CCIE)

My company has a lot of customers. Those customers have a lot of devices, usually 2 of which per site need an IP which cannot be NAT'd, because a direct connection is required for management and billing purposes. RFC1918 space is not enough, so they were addressed using real ipv4 space. Since
6/6 this year, we have been migrating management IP's to ipv6, allowing us to reclaim ipv4 space. This means we're not feeling the ipv4 glut and stinginess from ARIN anywhere nearly as bad as other folks.

While we were building the network out to deploy ipv6 for those devices, we also built in the capability to hand customers ipv6 addresses publicly, not simply for internal management and billing traffic. All we need to do is flip the switch, and they'll be handed public ipv6.

As ipv4 space becomes less available, the prices for ipv4 space will rise.
We may be able to use our reclaimed ipv4 space as another revenue stream for the holdouts who refuse to transition. You will also find things like prefix hijacking start to become more prevalent.

Ipv6 is coming, and you're coming with us whether you like it or not :) I know it's hard to believe, but there is a real and honest need for ipv6.
The real hold up is (and for the foreseeable future, will be) application and security support.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Sep 28 2012 - 18:10:09 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 01 2012 - 06:40:29 ART