Pardon me jumping in here - I just have a question about the original
question...
I understand that the question is referring to hierarchical qos - I
get that. But would there be a typical situation where you would want
to nest 'different' qos mechanisms (llq, cbwfq, etc)? Or is the
question just a "what if" scenario? My assumption is that best
practice would be to pick one and stick with it, but that is just how
I see it in my head. But if it is a "what if," then I understand.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:26 PM, ron wilkerson <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> This is normal practice, called hierarchical qos.
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2/qos/configuration/guide/qcfmcli2.html#wp1023458
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Imran Ali <immrccie_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> can we do rete-limiting , llq , cbwfq all in child policy map with
>> different classes and then shaping in parent policy map ?
>>
>> are their any caveats to consider ?
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Sep 14 2012 - 08:26:43 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Oct 01 2012 - 06:40:29 ART