RE: Load Balancers

From: <Neil_at_droopy.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:35:00 +0000

That is a cool date! On the Load balancer topic itself, I am waiting for the INE CCIE DC bootcamp to cover them. The could be totally integrated part of the CCIE DC lab or.. just a couple of points on the side.
My ccie number is not a type by the way.

Neil Moore
MASEx3(Networking/WiFi/Storage),CCIEx6 #10044 (R/S,Security,Service Provider,Voice,Storage,WiFi),CISSP,ITIL,MCSE,VCP4/5

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ryan West
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:30 PM
To: mgeorge_at_geores.net
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load Balancers

Good luck, that's a pretty sweet date.

-ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: mgeorge_at_geores.net [mailto:mgeorge_at_geores.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:27 PM
To: Ryan West
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load Balancers

My mistake, did not see the 2nd lie.

Good catch Nate! By the way you'll be glad to know my lab is scheduled for 12-12-12, airfare and hotel booked. Hopefully I'll get my digits soon.

I'm probably the biggest procrastinator you know but hey you know what they say... I'll worry about my procrastination tomorrow...

-Matthew

On 08/29/2012 03:23 PM, Ryan West wrote:
> By all means, feel free to waste your time then. The user has lied
> about the number twice, hardly a fat finger.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of mgeorge_at_geores.net
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 3:15 PM
> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Load Balancers
>
> Let me be clear by stating that I'm not defending CCIE KID but I'm
> really shocked to see how the community reacts when someone fat
> fingers a number. I honestly expected better from this community.
>
> I'm 100% sure everyone on this groupstudy list has fat fingered a
> number rather it be an ip address, as number, phone number or
> whatever.
>
> Last time I checked Cisco Load balancers such as the ACE are not
> covered on the CCIE Security or the CCIE Voice track, they are however
> listed in the blueprint of the new CCIE Data Center track.
>
> With that beign said, the most you can expect from him is to google
> his question in which case hes going to find a bunch of blogs written
> by cisco and f5 fans bashing each other over who is better.
>
> None the less, no one has answered his question and that is the very
> point of this group study.
>
>
> -Matthew George

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 29 2012 - 19:35:00 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Sep 01 2012 - 08:41:18 ART