RE: QOS Priority

yes that is a typo in email and not the in the real config, thanks for the
email guys, my real intention is prioritizing one protocol over the other but
i dont want to put bandwidth as such, but the bandwidth i am getting is 4mb on
FE, any suggestions ?

> Subject: Re: QOS Priority
> To: khanzadap_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> From: kalsaria.prakash_at_gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:21:45 +0000
>
> You have mapped wrong name mapped of the policy map under interface
>
> Use this one
> service-policy output mymap
>
>
> BR// Prakash Kalsaria
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sameer khan <khanzadap_at_hotmail.com>
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:52:39
> To: groupstudy<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Reply-To: sameer khan <khanzadap_at_hotmail.com>
> Subject: QOS Priority
>
> Hey
>
> I need some clarification on the following, as far as i have understood it,
> the policy-map will or should only apply when the interface is facing
> congestion, but i can still see ping being limited to 8kbps. By the way i
am
> testing it in Gns3
>
> Thanks
>
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 10.0.0.3 255.255.255.0
> speed 100
> full-duplex
> service-policy output smtp
>
>
> class-map match-all myclass
> match access-group 105
> !
> !
> policy-map mymap
> class myclass
> priority 8
>
>
>
> access-list 105 permit icmp any any
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Aug 27 2012 - 11:17:07 ART