True, many of 3330 prefixes are now in public use.
A.
On 7/29/2012 2:14 PM, Brian McGahan wrote:
> 3330 is obsolete. Many of these addresses are legit now. Check the bogon list: http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bogon-dd.html
>
> Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP/Security)
> bmcgahan_at_INE.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.INE.com
>
> On Jul 28, 2012, at 4:26 AM, "Alexei Monastyrnyi" <alexeim73_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> check RFC 3330 and 1918
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/2012 10:49 AM, Cisco Fanatic wrote:
>>> All - Could someone let me know as I have not been able to find any
>>> documentation to prove this?
>>> Are Private IPs (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16) blocked by Cisco
>>> IOS, PIX and ASA?
>>> -Yuri
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Jul 29 2012 - 14:16:49 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 01 2012 - 15:55:23 ART