Ray,
I got it, but if we don't have underlying IGP for example, we still can know the next-hop though IBGP.
Thanks alot, I apprecaite that.
From: mohd-mousa_at_hotmail.com
To: rtvrpk_at_gmail.com
Subject: RE: BGP next-hop
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 07:28:41 +0000
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 20:24:42 +0200
> Subject: Re: BGP next-hop
> From: rtvrpk_at_gmail.com
> To: mohd-mousa_at_hotmail.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>
> When using iBGP, it is assumed that there will be an underlying IGP to
> control/forward advetsisments. iBGP has AD of 200 and will typically lose
> out ot other routing protocols by design. It was set up this way as a loop
> prevention mechanisim. Like stated above, a route learned from outside the
> Internetwork is assumed to be valid best. This is not the case when the
> same route is learned internal to the AS.
>
>
>
> So the above is default behavior. We can peer iBGP neighbors with the
> 'next-hop' self command or use a route-map attached to the neighborship
> that changes next hop. It depends on what is trying to be accomplished.
>
>
> /ray
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:10 PM, <mohd-mousa_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > There is question for bgp next-hop, can we learn the next-hop through the
> > bgp
> > itself not through IGP ?
> >
> > Could anyone provide me with example why we can't do this, I tried to find
> > example but no luck !
> >
> >
> > Thanks Alot,
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 27 2012 - 17:08:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 01 2012 - 15:55:23 ART