Even if you don't configure a cluster-id it is inherited from your router-id. The only case where you really need to configure the cluster-id manually is when you have multiple route reflectors in the same cluster. Specifically this means that you would have two or more route reflectors that are servicing the same set of clients, and are also peering with each other as either clients or non-clients. When the route reflectors reflect the same set routes to each other, they will drop the incoming updates if they share the same cluster-id.
Really at the end of the day it doesn't matter how you configure it, because BGP will eventually stop the looping of updates either based on the originator-id or the cluster-id. The only difference is how far the update message is passed around before it is dropped. Also remember this is just a loop of control plane information, not of the data plane. In other words you could basically configure a full mesh of iBGP peers with every router as a route reflector, and each of their peers are clients, and the network would eventually work itself out.
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593 (R&S/SP/Security)
bmcgahan_at_INE.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.INE.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of jeremy co
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 3:57 AM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Cluster-ID and Originator-ID of group RR
Hi,
I understand that Originator-ID is a new way of detecing loop in group of Route reflectors insteadof cluster-ID
So if I have a scenario of group of RRs, to my understanding there is no need for cluster-ID to be configured under BGP process and originator-ID will take are of it.
Is that a correct assumption ?
thanks.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jul 23 2012 - 09:34:12 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 01 2012 - 15:55:23 ART