The simple answer is No as all below said, however you can see it clearly
in the RFC, basically the diff between an LSA of stub to non-stub is the
E-bit:
RFC 2328:
"The E-bit represents OSPF's ExternalRoutingCapability. This
bit should be set in all LSAs associated with the backbone,
and all LSAs associated with non-stub areas (see Section
3.6). It should also be set in all AS-external-LSAs. It
should be reset in all router-LSAs, network-LSAs and
summary-LSAs associated with a stub area. "
Regards,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:51 PM, <mohd-mousa_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Could be the area 0 be a stub area ? is there any beneifts from doing this
> ( if
> applicable )
>
> I tried to search for it, but didn't clear result
>
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Shiran Guez MCSE CCNP NCE1 JNCIA-ENT JNCIS-ENT CCIE #20572 http://cciep3.blogspot.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/cciep3 http://twitter.com/cciep3 Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sat Jul 14 2012 - 11:38:33 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Aug 01 2012 - 15:55:23 ART