Hi Azhar,
There's nothing like that that I'm aware of, I'm guessing that there's a
library of many lab scenarios Cisco can push your way and certain topics
may not be in each variant, so it's difficult to see how helpful such a
thing would be anyway.
You "just" need to get a handle on the blueprint - there's no way that
you'll touch every topic in the lab the blueprint is just too broad but you
could take some educated guesses with regards to L2 and L3 configurations,
various resiliency, security and services constructs most likely will be
there regardless of the lab you face.
https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-4603 is from the horses mouth,
if there's a topic you don't understand or remember well, you had better be
able to look it up very quickly. If you find you're doing more looking up
of the fundamentals rather than reading up on nuances you probably aren't
quite ready.
However it may be worth thinking of it this way. If your L2/L3 isn't
working, besides loosing points there, services that relies on that working
could lose you marks too even if the configs are right, that is there can
be follow on consequences (lost marks) if you don't get the fundamentals in
place.
Cheers,
Adam
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Azhar <azharafp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Adam,
>
> Before going to R&S LAB , i want to know about the marks breakup for each
> section. , i.e marks for each section ( Any URL ? )
>
>
> Regards
> Azhar
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Adam Booth <adam.booth_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Azhar,
>>
>> If you get >= 80% in Troubleshooting and >= 80% in Configuration and
>> Cisco gives you a number and you don't see anything except a pass for the
>> exam so it is feasible you messed up a few small areas and get no feedback
>> but who cares, you're now a CCIE!
>>
>> But if you want a slightly more detailed breakdown as to what your
>> weaknesses are, you actually need to fail and then I believe only the
>> configuration section do you get individual percentages which are based
>> broadly on technology/topics and I don't think they are equally weighted so
>> it's not a matter of adding those together and coming up with a result.
>>
>> Troubleshooting doesn't have a more granular breakdown as its just about
>> resolving enough tickets in accordance with the restrictions in the
>> timeframe allocated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Azhar <azharafp_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello every one.
>>>
>>> I want to know about the CCIE R&S LAB marks detail for LAB ( Marks
>>> breakup
>>> ) Can any body send this or share the URL for this information.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Azhar
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 27 2012 - 20:55:28 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 01 2012 - 10:39:53 ART