Re: Redistribute Connected with route-map

From: Raghava Rao <raghava.rao85_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:11:14 +0200

Hi Sergei

Which IOS are you running?

//RR

On 27 June 2012 11:18, Sergei Udovenko <udovenko_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Can't understand one issue. Let's say I have one Router with 4 connected
> interfaces, 3 of the I'm running OSPF and one I want to redistribute to
> OSPF as external. When doing *redistribute connected subnets route-map
> CONN->OSPF*
> *
> *
> Rack1SW1#sh route-map
> route-map CONN->OSPF, permit, sequence 10
> Match clauses:
> interface Loopback0
> Set clauses:
> Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
> route-map CONN->OSPF, deny, sequence 20
> Match clauses:
> Set clauses:
> Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
>
> On peering router i receive 3 of the as regular OSPF routes and one E2.
>
> My question is, when doing redistribution it's shouldn't check first
> connected routes running protocol *(AND IF I HAVE ROUTE-MAP matching only
> one connected interface, so i need to get only loopback interface on
> peering router?*) and after that sh ip route ospf for redistribution?
>
>
> --------------------
> Best regards,
> Sergei Udovenko
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 27 2012 - 12:11:14 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 01 2012 - 10:39:53 ART