Re: Redistribute Connected with route-map

This article I wrote sometime ago may help you understand the behavior better:

http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/06/21/redistributing-connected-routes/

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
:: This message was sent from a mobile device. I apologize for errors and brevity. ::
On Jun 27, 2012, at 5:18, Sergei Udovenko <udovenko_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Can't understand one issue. Let's say I have one Router with 4 connected
> interfaces, 3 of the I'm running OSPF and one I want to redistribute to
> OSPF as external. When doing *redistribute connected subnets route-map
> CONN->OSPF*
> *
> *
> Rack1SW1#sh route-map
> route-map CONN->OSPF, permit, sequence 10
>  Match clauses:
>    interface Loopback0
>  Set clauses:
>  Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
> route-map CONN->OSPF, deny, sequence 20
>  Match clauses:
>  Set clauses:
>  Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
> 
> On peering router i receive 3 of the as regular OSPF routes and one E2.
> 
> My question is, when doing redistribution it's shouldn't check first
> connected routes running protocol *(AND IF I HAVE ROUTE-MAP  matching only
> one connected interface, so i need to get only loopback interface on
> peering router?*) and after that sh ip route ospf for redistribution?
> 
> 
> --------------------
> Best regards,
> Sergei Udovenko
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net