Re: prefix and acl

Marc,

Where is link that tells exactly which version the lab switches are running?
"Lab switches run 12.2(44)SE"

Regards,
John

On 6/25/12, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I sent the proof in the VTP thread but I will put it here too. Marko is
> correct that VTP version 3 can not be currently tested in the lab because
> it is not available on the version of IOS running on the Catalyst 3560
> switches in the lab.
>
> Lab switches run 12.2(44)SE
>
> 12.2(52)SE and later support VTP version 3
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3560/software/release/12.2_52_se/configuration/guide/swvtp.html
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:31 PM, john matijevic
> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Marko,
>>
>> You did not clarify, Don clarified the question.
>> VTP3 can be tested on the lab from the Cisco documentation website
>> that I provided links to on other post.
>> I go from what Cisco says and what is documented. I have yet to see
>> where you get the information to suggest that Version 3 cannot be
>> asked.
>> "
>> > I will repeat once again that VTPv3 is not supported on the release of
>> > the software in the lab. It's up to you to either accept or not accept
>> > that.
>> "
>>
>> Where is this documented?
>>
>> Again, you should and i'll repeat again think before you speak, and
>> addiitonally please try and be professional.
>>
>> Until you can prove me wrong I have to go with what is documented on
>> Cisco's website as to the topics and software images on the Lab.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>>
>> On 6/25/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> > Yeah, the question was can the ACL be used instead of a prefix-list to
>> > accomplish the same result. We clarified that and that question was
>> > answered...
>> >
>> > I will repeat once again that VTPv3 is not supported on the release of
>> > the software in the lab. It's up to you to either accept or not accept
>> > that.
>> >
>> > Personally, I've had just about enough of arguing with you. Please,
>> > bother someone else. Or even better... spend time learning something
>> > so you can pass CCIE again.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> > Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:20 PM, john matijevic
>> > <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Marko,
>> >>
>> >> I disagree with you the question was very vague, you said you
>> >> understood I asked you to clarify and you could not, finally, Don
>> >> explained to me what his original intent was. But you answer that you
>> >> understood his requirements, and I asked you state what he was asking
>> >> and you could not provide.
>> >>
>> >> I prove you wrong again in other post VTP version 3 can be on exam,
>> >> you said its not on exam, I asked you to provide reference you could
>> >> not.
>> >>
>> >> Here is original question:
>> >> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> R2#show run | sec rip
>> >> router rip
>> >> version 2
>> >> network 10.0.0.0
>> >> distribute-list prefix 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>> >> no auto-summary
>> >>
>> >> R2#show run | sec prefix-list
>> >> ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
>> >>
>> >> R2#show ip route rip
>> >> R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19, FastEthernet0/0
>> >>
>> >> if I am using a standard ACL
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Standard ACL
>> >> R2#show run | sec rip
>> >> router rip
>> >> version 2
>> >> network 10.0.0.0
>> >> distribute-list 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>> >> no auto-summary
>> >>
>> >> R2#show run | sec access-list
>> >> access-list 1 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.0
>> >>
>> >> R2#show ip ro rip
>> >> R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> 193.1.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >> R 193.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>> >> 194.1.1.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >> R 194.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07, FastEthernet0/0
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please try to be nice and friendly im here to help the team.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> John
>> >>
>> >> On 6/25/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> >>> Below original question was output from various commands you didn't
>> >>> bother to look at.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> >>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, john matijevic
>> >>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> Marc,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I will repost original question and please identify in what way I
>> >>>> was
>> >>>> argumentitive or rude.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> {
>> >>>> Good Afternoon,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain Freeze
>> >>>> Thanks."
>> >>>>
>> >>>> What is this?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Very vague, can you please be more specific and describe exactly the
>> >>>> issue or problem that you are trying to solve?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please post network diagram and configurations.
>> >>>> }
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please try and be professional we are here to help not to be rude.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Regards,
>> >>>> John
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 6/25/12, Ronnie Angello <ronnie.angello_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> Don't mess with Marko! That's my brother from another mother...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://t.co/ggHcHwFO
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:47 AM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Here you are again arguing (and being very rude) to a CCIE again
>> >>>>>> (Marko
>> >>>>>> is
>> >>>>>> actually a 2X CCIE). The only reason you find the question vague
>> >>>>>> is
>> >>>>>> because
>> >>>>>> you lack the knowledge to understand the question. Marko was
>> >>>>>> taking
>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>>>> time to try to explain it and more detail to you and you act
>> >>>>>> ungrateful
>> >>>>>> and
>> >>>>>> tell him to think before he responds.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You should probably consider going to a CCNP study group until you
>> >>>>>> have
>> >>>>>> a
>> >>>>>> stronger foundation to discuss these topics, or at the very least
>> >>>>>> learn
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>> be respectful and admit that it is YOU that needs more explanation
>> >>>>>> and
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>> ask for it nicely.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -Marc Abel
>> >>>>>> CCIE #35470
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 6:50 PM, john matijevic
>> >>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Marko,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hasse was very vague with his question, since you understood what
>> >>>>>>> his
>> >>>>>>> question is I asked you to state it. Then Hasse responded with
>> >>>>>>> clarification.
>> >>>>>>> Please think before you respond.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>> John
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> He's asking can he filter a specific prefix using an extended
>> >>>>>>>> access
>> >>>>>>>> list, instead of using a prefix list. He gives an example where
>> >>>>>>>> he
>> >>>>>>>> tried with a prefix-list and the example where he tried an acl,
>> >>>>>>>> with
>> >>>>>>>> obviously different results. Someone very quickly pointed out
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> difference, with the link to the Cisco's and INE's blog
>> >>>>>>>> describing
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> particular use-case. Case closed, moving on. Don't overthink the
>> >>>>>>>> questions.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> >>>>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 3:29 PM, john matijevic
>> >>>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> Good Afternoon Marko,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Please enlighten us.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Here is the question:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal,
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Please clarify what this is? I don't understand what he is
>> asking?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>> John
>> >>>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> He did post the config snippets. I think the question was very
>> >>>>>>>>>> clear.
>> >>>>>>>>>> So were the answers :-)
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> >>>>>>>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:27 PM, john matijevic
>> >>>>>>>>>> <john.matijevic_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good Afternoon,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Freeze
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks."
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> What is this?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Very vague, can you please be more specific and describe
>> exactly
>> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>> issue or problem that you are trying to solve?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please post network diagram and configurations.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> John
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/24/12, Sarad <tosara_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hasse,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We can use a extended access-list in BGP to replace a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> prefix-list,
>> >>>>>>> But
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> IGP it appears differently as extended accesslist represent
>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> route
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> source and subnet (not subnet and subnet mask)
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have a look at this
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/01/04/using-extended-access-lists-in-a-distribute-list/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sara
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:12 PM, <daniel.dib_at_reaper.nu>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Hasse,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You are trying to match every class C address with /24 mask
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not possible with a standard ACL. If you used extended ACL
>> you
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> match
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mask like this.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> access-list 100 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.255 host
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 255.255.255.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> However I think this is only supported in BGP.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> /Daniel
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:02:01 +0200, Hasse wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can I do this with an acl or extended cal, I have a Brain
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Freeze
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> router rip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute-list prefix 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no auto-summary
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec prefix-list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ip prefix-list 1 seq 5 permit 192.0.0.0/3 ge 24 le 24
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show ip route rip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:19,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if I am using a standard ACL
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Standard ACL
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec rip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> router rip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> network 10.0.0.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribute-list 1 in FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> no auto-summary
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show run | sec access-list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> access-list 1 permit 192.0.0.0 31.255.255.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R2#show ip ro rip
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 223.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 200.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 193.1.1.0/25 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 193.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 192.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 195.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 194.1.1.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> R 194.1.1.0 [120/1] via 10.1.12.1, 00:00:07,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FastEthernet0/0
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ___________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**list/CCIELab.html<
>> >>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ______________________________**______________________________**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ___________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/**
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> list/CCIELab.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Marc Abel
>> >>>>>> CCIE #35470
>> >>>>>> (Routing and Switching)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Marc Abel
> CCIE #35470
> (Routing and Switching)

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jun 25 2012 - 13:40:21 ART