Re: Cisco One Article

From: Tony Singh <mothafungla_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:01:06 +0100

Agree with Marc, the definition of t-shooting would change and traditional wired approach would need mods, the rest would be identifying who's demarc

--
BR
Tony
Sent from my iPhone on 3
On 14 Jun 2012, at 06:54, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Software won't take away the need to know QoS and other CCIE level topics.I
> would be surprised to see the foundation of everything under the
> application layer disappear because a more powerful decision is making
> routing decisions. I see your point about HA. V Motion across the world and
> router lives every where. I think it's pretty cool but won't stop me from
> pursuing CCIE.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Marc
> 
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Lindsay Hill <lindsay.k.hill_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> Good engineers will always be needed.
>> 
>> Read @cloudtoad's latest for a bit of a take on future directions
>> 
>> http://packetpushers.net/it-is-dead-all-hail-systems-engineering/
>> 
>> 
>> On 14/06/2012, at 5:23 PM, marc edwards wrote:
>> 
>>> I still think things will fall back on traditional protocols. What
>> happens
>>> when there is a failure on controller? The practices taken to to
>>> traffic prioritization, path modification, dynamic discovery won't
>>> evaporate. You can't ignore the potential and yes a network engineer's
>> role
>>> will change but it cout have a positive spin...
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:16 PM, sameer khan <khanzadap_at_hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It seems cisco is jumping the bandwagon of SDN. But What the future hold
>>>> for
>>>> CCIE candidates ? Is it time to think about moving to software side ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:40:49 -0700
>>>>> From: bdennis_at_ine.com
>>>>> To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: Cisco One Article
>>>>> 
>>>>> Quote: "Cisco also unveiled proof-of-concept controller software and
>>>>> proof-of-concept OpenFlow v1.0 agent for its Catalyst 3750-X and 3560-X
>>>>> switches for SDN research"
>>>>> 
>>>>> But who uses 3750 and 3560's as a data center switch?  They should have
>>>>> started with something from the Nexus line.  I guess it's at least a
>>>> start.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
>>>>> bdennis_at_ine.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>>>>> http://www.INE.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 06/13/2012 12:24 PM, Tony Singh wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/061312-cisco-sdn-260138.html?hpg1=bn
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Some interesting ideas inc vxlan and software defined 3750x and 3560x
>>>> for
>>>> r&d, wish I was there
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> BR
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2 Jun 2012, at 16:38, WorkerBee<ciscobee_at_gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, there are customers in AU/NZ running QFabric in production.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Radioactive Frog<pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Both vendor still won't support a third party SFP! what a insane.
>>>>>>>> Is there anyone who've deployed Qfabric yet in production?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Joseph L. Brunner
>>>>>>>> <joe_at_affirmedsystems.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Ok ok ok - juniper boys settle down - we hear ya -
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Here is a breath of sanity on qfabric I found
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> http://www.mentby.com/chris-evans-2/qfabric.html
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On
>>>> Behalf
>>>> Of
>>>>>>>>> Karim Jamali
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 4:39 AM
>>>>>>>>> To: Alexander Halim; Cisco certification
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Article on Juniper QFabric
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I would say it is a much better architecture for various reasons.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1. With Nexus FEX, the N2K act as line cards&  all traffic has to
>> be
>>>> sent
>>>>>>>>> to the parent N5K whereas the QFnodes have a routing engine to
>>>> decide
>>>> where
>>>>>>>>> to send the packet.
>>>>>>>>> 2. There is only a single lookup across the whole system. There is
>> a
>>>>>>>>> Fabric Header that is added by the QFnodes to determine which
>> QFnode
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> packet should be sent to .
>>>>>>>>> 3. The system can scale up to 6,144 10GE ports and still managed as
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> single switch.
>>>>>>>>> 4. Fully converged I/O in terms of connecting the SAN switches to
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> QFnodes.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://juniper.mwnewsroom.com/press-releases/deutsche-boerse-group-selects-ju
>>>> niper-networks-to--nyse-jnpr-0816396
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://newsroom.juniper.net/press-releases/bell-canada-selects-juniper-networ
>>>> ks-single-tier--nyse-jnpr-0811293
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thank You
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Alexander
>>>> Halim<cisco.alexand_at_gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> It seems similar to Nexus FEX but with much higher port density.
>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>> has anyone deployed QFabric in production?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alexander Lim
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 2, 2012, at 4:48 AM, Sukhjit Hayre
>>>>>>>>>> <sukhjit.hayre_at_googlemail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> http://m.zimbio.com/Cisco+Systems+Inc./articles/k8ulf-PRjAg/Juniper+QF
>>>>>>>>>> abric+smashed+Cisco+dreams
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> BR
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Tony CCNP CCNA R&S JNCIS-SEC MCSE
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone on 3
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> ____________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> ___ Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> _ Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> KJ
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> 
> 
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: 
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jun 14 2012 - 08:01:06 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 01 2012 - 10:39:52 ART