Re: ipv6 point-to-point IPSEC

From: ron wilkerson <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:41:57 -0400

IPv6 ipsec uses tunnels only as far as i know.
older syntax is gone for IPv6 IPSEC.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Rich Collins <nilsi2002_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ron,
>
> I think I had seen that page but it shows setting up a tunnel. Maybe
> I'm missing something with the concept but isn't there a version with
> ipv6 without setting up a tunnel or VTI like the ipv4 version with
> "crypto map ...." and an access list to determine what should be
> encrypted?
>
> Thanks
> Rich
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:23 PM, ron wilkerson <ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > This should help:
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/ip6-ipsec.html#wp1106051
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Rich Collins <nilsi2002_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Could anyone give me a short example for a router running 12.4 or 15.
> >> of ipsec in IPv6? I found examples with setting up a tunnel but
> >> would need one without using a GRE tunnel.
> >>
> >> I am familiar with the ipv4 method and am looking for the same with
> >> ipv6 version.
> >>
> >> So basically ipv6 ipsec between two ipv6 endpoints.
> >> Does one still use the "crypto map ...." "set peer ..." "set
> >> transform-set .." and "match address (but ipv6 address list)"?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Rich
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jun 12 2012 - 22:41:57 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 01 2012 - 10:39:52 ART