Re: dynamips c3640 trunk problem nm-16esw

You can't do private vlans and MST too..

On 5/19/2012 3:40 PM, Ivan Hrvatska wrote:
> Yes, it works fine with just one module, but it is very limited with
> features. You cannot do most of the L2 labs, specially mls qos labs.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:34 AM, shekhar sharma
> <shekhar.sharma21_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> Any router with 2 nm-15esw module doesn't work with gns3. It works with only
>> single Nm-15esw module. I have also tried it multiple times before .But it
>> doesn't work. It is a bug in GNS3. It doesn't support 2 esw module.
>>
>> and yes you are right, configution will be fine, trunk links and access
>> ports links will be fine , But you will not be able to ping .
>>
>> Try connecting only single module , it will work 100%.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shekhar
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Ivan Hrvatska<ivanzghr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using c3640 with nm-16esw in dynamips as cat switch. If I have two
>>> 16esw modules in every 3640, one module has connected routers and the
>>> other
>>> is used for interconnection between switches. Problem is that R1,
>>> connected
>>> to Cat2, cannot ping BB1, connected to Cat1. Between switches dot1q trunk.
>>> Even configuration is good, ping failes. Same thing with c3725.
>>> When I use just one nm-16esw, where trunk between switches is together
>>> with
>>> connected routers on the same module, it works fine. Is there any catch
>>> with 2 modules since it doesn't not work? Thanks for help.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 19 2012 - 16:38:38 ART