What's your memory(DRAM) on this box and anticipated number os routes per Cu/vrf ?
Sent from my BlackBerry. wireless device from STC
-----Original Message-----
From: Serdar Kut <kutserdar_at_gmail.com>
Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:11:24
To: Uchil Perera<uchil.groupstudy_at_gmail.com>
Reply-To: Serdar Kut <kutserdar_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco certification<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Max BGP peer count for Sup32
Hi Uchil,
Actually box will not be a traditional PE and I dont want to deal with RR
stuff hence customers will have redundant peerings to another PE of mine
again. eBGP serves my wishes fairly well.
I'm thinking of connecting one 7609-Sup32 to another 7609-Sup720-10G and
create 200 vrfs and eBGP peerings on both and see what happens then. I
think so sup720-10 is more than enough but I wonder the performance of
sup32.
Regards,
Serdar Kut
CCIE2#18130
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Uchil Perera <uchil.groupstudy_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Serdar,
>
> Sorry, I missed your point on 200 eBGP client sessions. Took it as
> iBGP ....my mistake !!!! :P
> Therefore not sure on performance impact on 7600, but I think 720-10G
> should be Ok ....but cannot be sure since I have not experienced this.
>
>
> Rgds
>
> Uchil
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Uchil Perera
> <uchil.groupstudy_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Serdar,
> >
> > Do you mean 200 iBGP peers ? If it is used as a MPLS PE, it should be
> > iBGP. Best option is to have redundant RR's to limit iBGP sessions.
> > As per your requirement Sup720/10G is recommended.
> >
> > Rgds
> >
> > Uchil
> > CCIE # 18536 (R&S, SP)
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Serdar Kut <kutserdar_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> My question is how many e-bgp peerings can be established on a 7609 -
> Sup32
> >> platform. I plan to use it as a PE and it will have around 200+ vrfs for
> >> each customer. By the way customer lines are about 2mb/s and not much
> >> traffic on it.
> >>
> >> Can sup32 handle about 200+ ebgp peerings with 20 prefix for each peer
> and
> >> timers 1sec/3sec? also for faster convergence scan timer may be
> configured
> >> to minimal. Or upgrading to sup720-10G better?
> >>
> >> Does anyone have any scaling numbers or experience on that?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> Serdar Kut
> >> CCIE2#18130
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 17 2012 - 23:37:18 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 17 2012 - 09:04:19 ART