RE: CCIE#35347

Thanks for sharing your story Terry. Heart warming.

Regards,
Sid
Nobody's really listening, until you make a mistake...

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Terry Vinson
Sent: 08 May 2012 19:03
To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: CCIE#35347

*Hello Everyone,*

*I passed the CCIE R&S lab on May 1, 2012 at RTP, NC.*

*Ive tried to write my success story about a hundred times since I got my
pass notification for the Routing and Switching track. Each attempt,
however, has sounded more angry than happy, which is odd because I am
ecstatic to have passed. Not having to study anymore and having decided to
take a week off from everything but family has given me a lot of time to
reflect on why I get so upset when I think about the last five years. I made
the realization last night that my anger stems from feeling like I wasted a
lot of time, and went up a lot of blind alleys during my preparation. I need
to put things in perspective before I explain that any further. I am 45
years old. I have four sons ranging in ages from 5 to 22, I am a
self-employed consultant, and in the current economy we have been struggling
just to get by. So in a nutshell my preparation came out of my own pocket
and I spent way more than I should have to get where I am. I bought
materials, in the last three years, from virtually every major vendor I can
think of, to include Cisco 360.*

*I found out about Narbik Kocharians on GroupStudy.com and contacted him and
let him know that I was very dissatisfied with the first CCIE vendor I chose
to use due a customers helping customers approach for guidance and support
with the package. Narbik was very understanding and explained to me that he
thought I had large gaps in my foundational theory. He told me that we could
fix that together. I bought his workbook and set out to fix the problem. I
was livid at how much I didnt know after a year and a half of using the
first vendor. I flooded Narbik with my frustration and again he just let me
vent and then said we can fix that too. He told me that he was going to have
a bootcamp in Columbia, Maryland starting on Monday; this was Sunday and he
said I could come if I wanted to. I did want to, but we didnt have the
money to pay for a hotel. So I slept in my truck for a week in an arctic
sleeping bag because it was winter. That sucked, but honestly I had slept in
way worse conditions when I was a soldier. It was worth every second of it.
I learned more in 5 days than I had in the previous year. The sad part was
that my lab was scheduled for 15 days after the bootcamp and Narbik told me
straight up I wasnt ready for it. That was a tough pill to swallow, but he
was right. I didnt even come close to passing, but like Narbik said, you
know what to expect now!*

*So the next year was all about filling gaps in my knowledge, reading books
and labs using Narbiks workbooks. In the next two years, I took Narbiks
bootcamp again twice (at no cost and received updates for all the workbooks
 again at no cost). At the end of the last bootcamp, Narbik told me that he
thought I was borderline ready, but I needed more lab work (I was too slow).
I didnt know how to answer that because I had done every lab he had to
offer half a dozen times. So ignoring his advice I again scheduled a lab. I
failed again but I was so much closer. But I found another weakness that I
hadnt really considered. My test taking strategy was virtually nonexistent;
I was working and thinking too linear. That was when I met Anthony
Sequiera.*

*Anthony was not what I was expecting from a CCIE instructor, he was
frequently talking about other things than just technology. He was bringing
up things that affected my performance on the lab that I had honestly never
even considered. We exchanged emails and he made me a promise. Ill help
you get your CCIE no matter what the circumstances are or who Im working
for. Anthony was able to open a lot of opportunities for me to learn and
practice and was constantly offering support and advice. But at this point I
was gun shy of the exam. I was so afraid of failing again I wasnt willing
to test. It took a long time for Anthony to help me break down those
barriers. But eventually we did and I scheduled the exam, this time it was
the Version 4 exam. Anthony and I where both focused on the TS section,
because frankly it seemed to be what most people were failing, and the fact
that there were no real tools available to students to help them deal with
this new lab requirement was adding to my apprehension. So rather than just
take a wild swing we got together with the great minds over at IPexpert, who
I should point out Narbik had recommended I use for my mock lab practice.
Anthony and I created a tool that made sense and held up to the
troubleshooting labs I had from all vendors  the Quick Fire Troubleshooting
Strategy. We spent countless hours discussing it, tearing it apart, and
testing it against whatever mock troubleshooting materials we could find.*

*Quick Fire centers around a common issues methodology combined with intense
time management. In our opinion, the biggest problem in the training space
at that time was that everyone talked about troubleshooting and even
discussed how to approach troubleshooting, but nothing dealt with the
biggest issue, which is the two-hour time limit. After getting comfortable
using the Quick Fire Troubleshooting Strategy, we decided that I should
schedule a lab. The good news was that the troubleshooting plan worked
AWESOME! I knew I had 8 out of 10 tickets and was unsure about one, the
other I did not have a clue if I solved it correctly or not. The outcome
was not what I was hoping for, because I did not pass the configuration
section, but Quick Fire held up perfectly. What would have been another blow
to my ego, was actually an opportunity to retest the troubleshooting
strategy Anthony and I developed. So I scheduled another lab; what would be
my second attempt at the Version 4 with troubleshooting.*

*During the next 30 days I didnt even really focus on the lab, but every so
often I would do an IPexpert Volume 3 lab just to keep my speed from
deteriorating. Come test time I was way more relaxed, had more even more
faith in Quick Fire. I even adapted some of the methodology from the
troubleshooting process to the configuration section of the test. In the end
it all culminated in passing the lab and getting my digits. Thats the long
and short of it.*

*In my opinion it all boils down to the fact that the CCIE exam has changed,
its no longer, answer all the core questions and pick up a few of the
services and management tasks and you are golden. In my opinion, that test
doesnt exist anymore. The new test is a broad range of topics that all have
relatively the same weight, the concept of the core and fundamental
reachability is there but its no longer 70 to 75 percent of passing. Cisco
has upped the ante in terms of the significance of these miscellaneous
topics, and to tell students that they are not going to expect you to be an
expert on them is an out-and-out travesty.*

*It was a long expensive journey to get to the point where I had all the
tools I needed to pass and honestly, we had to invent a few along the way as
a result of the exam changing and maturing. Technological proficiency was
pivotal, but having a well-considered and practiced strategy was just as
important. That concept of strategy extends not just to the actual lab but
also to the act of preparing for the lab. I came late in my preparation to
IPexpert on the advice of both Narbik and Anthony, and I found just what I
needed there. They had an honest, structured approach that addressed all
phases of the CCIE learning process to include tools like Markos wonderful
audio bootcamp that was one of best knowledge sustainment tools Ive had the
pleasure to use. But for me, the workbooks were the most impressive offering
because by the time I found IPexpert, that was what I was looking for. I
wanted, no I needed, multiprotocol labs that where reflective of what Id
had come to expect to see on the exam after my failed attempts.
Their workbooks were concise, well planned and the closest Ive seen to the
actual exam with regard to the wording and structure of the individual
tasks. The integration between workbooks was seamless. It wasnt a series of
workbooks created, in a handful of weeks, by different developers with no
clear transition. As I worked through these books I could feel my confidence
and general understanding growing, and that process continued until the CCIE
was just a fundamental part of that transition.*

*It is important to understand that everyone learns differently and at
different rates. But the one constant is that learning needs to be
deliberate, and that is so much easier when the actual course instruction is
deliberate by design. Furthermore, you need to find vendors like IPexpert
and Micronics Training that are willing to devote themselves to your
success.*

*I am very proud to say that I am now employed writing elegant, yet
practical and accessible texts and classes for IPexpert in the area of CCIE
R&S. I hope I have the opportunity to provide assistance to some of you
reading this, just as I received the assistance that I so desperately
needed.*

*For those thinking about giving up. Don't do it! The elation of success
will completely erase the grief you felt when you didn't pass. It felt bad
to fail but absolutely incredible to pass!*

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue May 08 2012 - 20:57:25 ART