Re: Cisco 1841

From: marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:22:19 -0700

Jamaica! Rasta!

On Friday, May 4, 2012, Jay McMickle wrote:

> I am! Nice thing about Jamaica- they believe in Wireless!
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Jay
> McMickle- CCIE #35355
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: marc abel
> <marcabel_at_gmail.com>
> To: Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>
> Cc: Lucky
> <iamreallylucky_at_gmail.com>; "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com" <
> ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Cisco 1841
>
> Jay, shouldn't you
> be sipping fruit drinks and laying on the beach?
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:12
> AM, Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> > I hate to ask again, but is
> there a network diagram of this to better
> > explain?
> >
> > The hardware platform
> would only facilitate speed, options, and hardware
> > WIC's.
> >
> > From there, we
> can better assist.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jay McMickle- CCIE
> > #35355
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ________________________________
> > From: Lucky
> > <iamreallylucky_at_gmail.com>
> >
> To: Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>
> > Cc:
> > "ccielab_at_groupstudy.com"
> <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, May 4, 2012
> > 5:02 AM
> > Subject: Re:
> Cisco 1841
> >
> > After a long I am reply for this, since the
> > need has arised
> to sort out
> > this ...
> >
> > need help on this
> >
> > OPtion 1 -
> >
> > I am
> >
> thinking to have additional HWIC slot for the router and configure it
> > so
> that
> > from router 1 interface for wan link, 2 interface for lan - (from
> >
> which 1
> > interface will go to one firewall for one tunnel) - from 2nd lan
> >
> interface
> > will go to second firewall for second tunnel.
> >
> > OPtion 2
> >
> > I
> should upgrade...
> > an 1841 by getting - 3900 series router and do the
> >
> consiguration
> >
> > once i get
> > the card and insert I need help in the
> configuration changes -
> >
> > what i need to
> > do inorder to configure adsl
> router so that from router 1
> > interface for wan
> > link, 2 interface for lan -
> (from which 1 interface will
> > go to one firewall
> > for one tunnel) - from 2nd
> lan interface will go to
> > second firewall for second
> > tunnel.
> >
> > Total 16
> wan ips i have.
> >
> > I Need help on a sample configuration - on
> > how this can
> be achieved.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Jay McMickle
> >
> <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So, the CP FW is the outer facing edge,
> > where the NAT occurs, and the 1841
> > > is the VPN termination point?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Regards,
> > > Jay McMickle- CCNP,CCSP,CCDP
> > > Sent from iJay
> > >
> > > On
> Apr 3, 2012,
> > at 11:47 PM, Lucky <iamreallylucky_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> Thanks jay,
> > > to be
> > more precise ,
> > > currently two ports in 1841 are
> already used for nat inside
> > and outside
> > > and it gets terminated at
> production network through checkpoint
> > firewall -
> > > this has an existing
> tunnel to london. I want to create another
> > tunnel to
> > > london without
> disturbing the existing network and put another
> > port in 1841.
> > >
> > > in
> the 1841 i want to insert another card with ethernet
> > port, configure
> > > so
> that i can connect to another firewal and create my
> > tunnel- is this
> > >
> possible
> > > is it possible for the 1841 to handle this
> > >
> > right now only
> two ports are there in 1841 and already used for nat
> > > inside,
> > outside ,
> so the above scenarios is possible.
> > > thanks
> > > lucky
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed,
> >
> Apr 4, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Jay McMickle <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> Are
> > you stating that you want to stand up another L2L tunnel, with a
> > >>
> separate
> > IP (from the same

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri May 04 2012 - 13:22:19 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 17 2012 - 09:04:19 ART