RE: Cisco MC-LAG

From: Aaron <aaron1_at_gvtc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:18:22 -0500

I just read this... " Its implementation varies by vendor. "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MC-LAG

MC-LAG, or Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation Group, is a type of LAG with
constituent ports that terminate on separate chassis, thereby providing
node-level redundancy. Unlike link aggregation in general, MC-LAG is not
covered under IEEE 802.1AX-2008. Its implementation varies by vendor.

Aaron

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:49 AM
To: Edmore Chingwena
Cc: groupstudy
Subject: Re: Cisco MC-LAG

Dude

I doubt anyone would have hands on experience with this, best you sniff and
see if non vendor devices speak the same language.
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!

-----Original Message-----
From: Edmore Chingwena <chingwenaed_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:05:50
To: Sirhan Khan<khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com>
Cc: groupstudy<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Cisco MC-LAG

Hi Sirhan

The CEs talk to each other over (VLL on the upstream and VPLS downstream
connection-DUAL connection) So at Layer 2 do not have VRRP as an option My
question is am seing what looks like compatibility issues between Cisco
MC-LAG and a non-cisco device so wanted to confirm is cisco MC-LAG works
well with other vendors. I have this working well with a single chasis cisco
ASR and two non-cisco devices.

On 12 April 2012 16:14, Sirhan Khan <khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Keep it simple dude, VRRP between CE if you manage it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Edmore Chingwena
> <chingwenaed_at_gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Experts
>>
>> I wish to check the following
>>
>> 1. Does Cisco MC-LAG work well with other vendor implementation in a
>> cenerio where you have 2 Cisco and 2 Non-Cisco interconnected by
>> single links forming a square one Cisco to one non Cisco .
>>
>> Provided the above works well, which is a better solution MC-LAG or
>> use of VRRP for a CE devices conneced to two other CEs(for redundancy
>> purpoces) over a L2 MPLS based network from another vendor eg
>> Juniper/Alcatel
>>
>> The question is whether to configure VRRP on the CE devices or MC-LAG
>> between the PE from the MPLS provider and the two CE facing the MPLS
>> cloud
>>
>> The fist CE(Remote side) connects to One PE(No MC-LAG/VRRP) the other
>> two
>> CE(MC-LAG/VRRP) connect to two PEs at one location providing node and
>> link redundacy
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> __ Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 12 2012 - 14:18:22 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 01 2012 - 08:20:45 ART