Re: Cisco MC-LAG

From: Sirhan Khan <khan.sirhan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:14:10 +0200

Keep it simple dude, VRRP between CE if you manage it.

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Edmore Chingwena <chingwenaed_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Experts
>
> I wish to check the following
>
> 1. Does Cisco MC-LAG work well with other vendor implementation in a
> cenerio where you have 2 Cisco and 2 Non-Cisco interconnected by single
> links forming a square one Cisco to one non Cisco .
>
> Provided the above works well, which is a better solution MC-LAG or use of
> VRRP for a CE devices conneced to two other CEs(for redundancy purpoces)
> over a L2 MPLS based network from another vendor eg Juniper/Alcatel
>
> The question is whether to configure VRRP on the CE devices or MC-LAG
> between the PE from the MPLS provider and the two CE facing the MPLS cloud
>
> The fist CE(Remote side) connects to One PE(No MC-LAG/VRRP) the other two
> CE(MC-LAG/VRRP) connect to two PEs at one location providing node and link
> redundacy
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 12 2012 - 16:14:10 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue May 01 2012 - 08:20:45 ART