Re: /32 address for MP-BGP neighbors

You are absolutely correct. The peering routes DO NOT have to be /32 but
LSP must be end-to-end for MPLS VPNs to work. It may not always be obvious
that you don't have an end-to-end LSP.

Here's some reading material that should give you two fun scenarios to play
with:

http://blog.ipexpert.com/2012/01/10/mpls-l3vpn-and-summarized-loopback-routes/
http://blog.ipexpert.com/2010/05/31/next-hop-in-mpls-vpns/

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:41, Sud <mitsuie2_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it really required to have a /32 address for MP-BGP neighbor
> relationship?
>
> What I think is you can do that as long as you have a consistent LSP path
> for the prefix you are choosing.
>
> Sud
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net