Re: Conditional Based Routing

Yes... This is stuff we use alot. I also use the ip sla tracking tied down to
static routes for redundant connections to customers..... Try the Boolean
logic as well it's a nice feature

Regards,
 Joe Sanchez

On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:19 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Now I am curious on how after setting up a track how this can be applied to
route-map to set next hop. Lets keep this one going I think it has some exam
relevance and in the process give Vishal some options...
>
> Marc
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> There is for sure some relevance to Joe's suggestion I am looking at Doc CD
now here:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/configuration/12-4
t/iap-eot.html#GUID-FDCACD5E-0F4C-43C8-8770-93CC8883D0A6
>
> Might shed some light if you decide to travel that road.
>
> Marc
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree Marc,,,, I must like making things more interesting..... :)
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Visahl:
>
> Before it gets too complicated. I do think that your suggestion of
>
> ip route 172.16.50.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel 2 200 is worth a shot
>
> I don't see this being a problem unless you igp is iBGP...
>
> What do you think Joe?
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Vishal,
>
> Look into tracking, or enhanced object tracking.
>
> JS
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Vishal Rane
<vishal.rane_at_hotmail.co.in>wrote:
>
> > Hello Is it possible to have a conditional based Routing where Dynamic
> > Routing is preferred and if no reachability to Host via Dynamic Routing
> > Protocol then Static Routes takes over Or will this static statement
> > work as
> > non-preferred route ip route 172.16.50.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel 2 200
> > Thanks
> > Vishal (( SCENARIO
> >
> >
))^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^set
> > up where Site A is connected to Site B , Site B is connected to Site C
> > A------------B-----------------CSite A connected to Site B < GRE over
IPSEC
> > with OSPF > Site B connected to Site C < Point to Point > To have
> > redundancy
> > betwen Site A and Site C we configured < GRE over IPSEC > Traffic dont
pass
> > from Site A to Site C using the GRE Tunnel when we manullay shutdown the
> > interface on Site C ( interface which is P-2-P with Site B ) show ip
route
> > output indicates traffic still passing A-----B------C unless i have a
> > static
> > route on Site Aip route 172.16.50.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel 2 ( Tunnel
2
> > is
> > GRE tunnel between Site A and Site C ) We prefer to have Primay path
for
> > Site C from Site A -> A ------------ B ------------------C if link
> > between
> > B------C is down thenFailover path would be A-------------------C
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 09 2012 - 17:50:17 ART