Re: Conditional Based Routing

Now I am curious on how after setting up a track how this can be applied to
route-map to set next hop. Lets keep this one going I think it has some
exam relevance and in the process give Vishal some options...

Marc

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> There is for sure some relevance to Joe's suggestion I am looking at Doc
> CD now here:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/configuration/12-4t/iap-eot.html#GUID-FDCACD5E-0F4C-43C8-8770-93CC8883D0A6
>
>
> Might shed some light if you decide to travel that road.
>
> Marc
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree Marc,,,, I must like making things more interesting..... :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:41 PM, marc edwards <renorider_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Visahl:
>>>
>>> Before it gets too complicated. I do think that your suggestion of
>>>
>>> ip route 172.16.50.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel 2 200 is worth a shot
>>>
>>> I don't see this being a problem unless you igp is iBGP...
>>>
>>> What do you think Joe?
>>>
>>> Marc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Joe Sanchez <marco207p_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Vishal,
>>>>
>>>> Look into tracking, or enhanced object tracking.
>>>>
>>>> JS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Vishal Rane <vishal.rane_at_hotmail.co.in
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hello Is it possible to have a conditional based Routing where
>>>> Dynamic
>>>> > Routing is preferred and if no reachability to Host via Dynamic
>>>> Routing
>>>> > Protocol then Static Routes takes over Or will this static statement
>>>> > work as
>>>> > non-preferred route ip route 172.16.50.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel 2 200
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> > Vishal (( SCENARIO
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> ))^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^set
>>>> > up where Site A is connected to Site B , Site B is connected to Site C
>>>> > A------------B-----------------CSite A connected to Site B < GRE over
>>>> IPSEC
>>>> > with OSPF > Site B connected to Site C < Point to Point > To have
>>>> > redundancy
>>>> > betwen Site A and Site C we configured < GRE over IPSEC > Traffic
>>>> dont pass
>>>> > from Site A to Site C using the GRE Tunnel when we manullay shutdown
>>>> the
>>>> > interface on Site C ( interface which is P-2-P with Site B ) show ip
>>>> route
>>>> > output indicates traffic still passing A-----B------C unless i have a
>>>> > static
>>>> > route on Site Aip route 172.16.50.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel 2 (
>>>> Tunnel 2
>>>> > is
>>>> > GRE tunnel between Site A and Site C ) We prefer to have Primay
>>>> path for
>>>> > Site C from Site A -> A ------------ B ------------------C if link
>>>> > between
>>>> > B------C is down thenFailover path would be A-------------------C
>>>> >
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 09 2012 - 15:19:01 ART