Re: HDLC IP unnumbered with EIGRP

No, I don't think so.

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Marc,
> Yes, that's an alternative, but i'm wondering if there is a nicer solution
> similar to the one in PPP, where it would work all of the time.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:59 PM, marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can't you just manipulate the metrics to make the serial link
>> more preferred?
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I came upon a scenario that I'm not sure how to solve, hopefully someone
>>> can help.
>>>
>>> I have three routers connected in a triangle.
>>> (R4)-s0/0/1------s0/0/1-(R5)-s0/0/0------R3---R4
>>>
>>> On R4 and R5 I'm trying to setup ip unnumbered address based on a
>>> loopback.
>>> The serial interfaces are running hdlc.
>>> I have eigrp enabled on all interface.
>>>
>>> Here is the problem.
>>> R4 seems R5 as an eigrp neighbor over s0/0/1, R5 sees the same things,
>>> but
>>> they prefer to route to each other using R3 as it has a lower metric.
>>> I know that if I had used PPP encapsulation, then each router would
>>> install a host route to the directly connected interface (s0/0/1), but
>>> when
>>> using hdlc that does not happen.
>>>
>>> D 167.1.45.5/32 [90/4857856] via 167.1.34.3, 00:12:19, Serial0/0/0
>>> <-R4 uses R3 as the next hop
>>> C 167.1.45.4/32 is directly connected, Loopback45
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone know how to solve this?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>>
>>> (by the way this is a modified version of the INE vol 2 lab 14 task 1.7)
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Apr 07 2012 - 16:42:29 ART