Re: ospf authentication

From: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:43:29 -0700

Unbelievable

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 11, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Brian Dennis <bdennis_at_ine.com> wrote:

> I of course didn't read this email thread as I'm sure it's a total waste of anyone's time but I have to ask. Is this what the CCIE industry has become? People arguing about semantics to boast their own egos?
>
> If someone is too confused and can't wrap their head around the fact type 0 authentication means authentication isn't done (aka disabled, null, no, etc) but is considered an authentication type that can be set as per the RFC, then that someone doesn't need to be a CCIE to begin with.
>
> --
> Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
> bdennis_at_ine.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.INE.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Mar 11 2012 - 17:43:29 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 01 2012 - 07:56:52 ART