Re: 50Mb across the country in 6 seconds

From: Carlos G Mendioroz <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 18:10:56 -0300

I don't follow.
If latency is not taken into account (nobody has talk about that)
then a 1Gb is what I have between my desktop and my disk server here,
and it takes less than 2 seconds to copy a 50MB file.

And please, dont' follow cisco way of negating anything twice or three
times in the same phrase :) (Unless... is not ...)

-Carlos

Marko Milivojevic @ 03/03/2012 17:54 -0300 dixit:
> Unless my Saturday-pre-lunch calculation is not broken, even with MTU
> of 1500 bytes, this comes down to some 5400 packets per second
> (without protocol overhead), which is a far cry from impossible on a
> 1Gb/s link.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:49, Jersey Guy<guy.jersey_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Gents. This DBA guy tells me he copied a 50Mb file from his machine
>> in New Jersey to a server in California in 6 seconds. I told him that's not
>> possible because the smallest link in the path is 1Gb/sec but MTU is 1500,
>> so even if you take wire speed, it would be at least 33 seconds before the
>> file was copied. B Am I wrong in saying so?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos G Mendioroz  <tron_at_huapi.ba.ar>  LW7 EQI  Argentina
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Mar 03 2012 - 18:10:56 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 01 2012 - 07:56:51 ART