Marc/Vincent,
There is no match-any for a route-map (this is for class-maps). The logic is an AND for multiple match statements in a route-map. Therefore case #1 won't match anything and case #2 will match either.
cheers,
Ben.
From: marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com<mailto:marcabel_at_gmail.com>>
Reply-To: marc abel <marcabel_at_gmail.com<mailto:marcabel_at_gmail.com>>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:22:30 -0600
To: Vincent Tay <vtay.75_at_gmail.com<mailto:vtay.75_at_gmail.com>>
Cc: "Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<mailto:Ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<mailto:ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>>
Subject: Re: Route-Map clarification
route-map CONDITIONAL
match ip address prefix R1
match ip address prefix R2
This won't match anything because the default is match all. A prefix can't
match both. You probably want:
route-map match-any CONDITIONAL
match ip address prefix R1
match ip address prefix R2
-Marc
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Vincent Tay <vtay.75_at_gmail.com<mailto:vtay.75_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Can any explain the below differences?
*CASE 1*
ip prefix-list R1 permit 164.1.13.0/24
ip prefix-list R2 permit 164.1.23.0/24
route-map CONDITIONAL
match ip address prefix R1 * -> Is this suppose to be match
prefix R1 AND R2?*
match ip address prefix R2
router ospf 1
default-information originate route-map CONDITIONAL
*CASE 2*
ip prefix-list R1_OR_R2 permit 164.1.13.0/24
ip prefix-list R1_OR_R2 permit 164.1.23.0/24
route-map CONDITIONAL
match ip address prefix R1_OR_R2
router ospf 1
default-information originate route-map CONDITIONAL
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Feb 29 2012 - 22:48:41 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 01 2012 - 11:46:56 ART