Re: assist with eigrp pe-ce showing zero successor for a

I haven't gotten this far myself to study this type of route-map for BGP.
I tried it out briefly but it seemed to remove the entry
completely(wouldn't be imported anymore) or I could replace it with
another rt but then the additional metrics you mention appeared back
in.

I'll try some more tomorrow.
Thanks
Rich

On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> Actually, I owe you all an apology. You can lie that it's NOT an EIGRP
> route, but not artificially create one (even though I remember doing
> that).
>
> The "secret" is in EIGRP extended communities:
>
> R2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf a 10.0.0.5
> BGP routing table entry for 24:24:10.0.0.5/32, version 8
> Paths: (1 available, best #1, table a)
> Advertised to update-groups:
> 1
> Local
> 10.2.5.5 from 0.0.0.0 (192.168.0.2)
> Origin incomplete, metric 2297856, localpref 100, weight 32768,
> valid, sourced, best
> Extended Community: RT:24:24
> Cost:pre-bestpath:128:2297856 (default-2145185791) 0x8800:32768:0
> 0x8801:25:640000 0x8802:65281:1657856 0x8803:65281:1500
> mpls labels in/out 18/nolabel
>
> Take a look at all those 0x880x ones. They define EIGRP metric and
> metric type. You can delete them using "extcomm-list delete", but not
> manually set them, which was what I was alluding at. Sorry :-)
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:07, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> Actually no, it will be on the one that runs OSPF. You need to lie to
>> the other one how these routes came from EIGRP and not OSPF... :-)
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 23:29, Rich Collins <nilsi2002_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I've been looking at your exercise and could it till now but am
>>> curious to hear the answer on this one.
>>> I am assuming that this trick is to be done on the PE running the IGP EIGRP.
>>>
>>> -Rich
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>> You got it all -- well done. Now, as an exercise, try tricking your
>>>> EIGRP on the receiving end to accept that OSPF-injected route as an
>>>> internal one ;-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S)
>>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Feb 20 2012 - 23:24:42 ART