Re: LMS Vs NCS

From: Ronnie Angello <ronnie.angello_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:33:06 -0500

Ok, one more clarification... The best description that I've seen for NCS
(after a couple min of research) is that it manages the access layer -
wireless, access switches, and endpoints. LMS would provide more
comprehensive management of your wired devices throughout the network -
routers and switches, and other wired devices to some extent.
On Feb 12, 2012 8:11 AM, "Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, you obviously wouldn't have much use for NCS if you don't have Cisco
> wireless products to manage. I think there may be some overlap there, but
> LMS is still the flagship management product for Cisco wired networks.
>
> Ronnie
> On Feb 12, 2012 8:02 AM, "Ronnie Angello" <ronnie.angello_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> NCS is basically the new version of WCS under the Cisco Prime umbrella,
>> with added support for wired devices. It adds some visibility into the
>> wired network but I don't think that there is that much functionality
>> there. You would still want LMS or another vendor's product for
>> configuration management, software image management, etc.
>>
>> There are other solutions out there that are going to be comparable to or
>> better than LMS, but they may be more expensive. It all depends on your
>> requirements. If you have a multi-vendor network to manage, then you will
>> obviously need to go above and beyond LMS.
>>
>> Ronnie
>> On Feb 12, 2012 6:34 AM, "John Haddad" <loserboy3000_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Good day everyone,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> i have searched for the
>>> differences between LMS and NCS and nothing major was found
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> NCS is mainly used for
>>> the wireless and now it has been developed to be using for monitoring the
>>> wired
>>> connection as well, it is really excellent in terms of monitoring the
>>> wireless
>>> because
>>> it shows RF interfering, reporting, step by step of troubleshooting
>>> wireless
>>> issue
>>>
>>> On the other hand NCS
>>> has a lot bugs to monitor the wired connection because it is newly added
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LMS ==h I cannot see any added value to go with it if
>>> we compare with other monitoring tools from other vendor
>>>
>>> Other vendor can provide
>>> a facilities to do all of LMS can do in addition to interoperability and
>>> monitoring other vendors such as HP, Aruba etc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Team do you have any
>>> more information on this regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LMS Vs NCS
>>>
>>> LMS Vs other monitoring
>>> from other Vendor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Feb 12 2012 - 08:33:06 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 01 2012 - 11:46:56 ART