Hi all
I understood the logic of using GRE over MPLS now. It seems that my
customer is encrypting the banking traffic from their branch office to head
office and they r using GRE for encapsulating the entire MPLS L2VPN traffic
from the customer site and encapsulating in GRE and then Encrypting using
IPsec and then sending it over the tunnel tail end and decryption happens
there .
So why cant just encrypt raw MPLS frame rather than another overhead like
GRE or else is there any use for it
I know IPSec cant encypt multicast traffic and u cant run routing protocols
to it. But why not only MPLS ?
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:54 AM, David Prall <dcp_at_dcptech.com> wrote:
> If you want to run MPLS over a L3 provider, or you want to encrypt all the
> traffic. Rather than running multiple IPSec sessions, one for each VRF,
> just
> run MPLS over GRE over IPSec.
>
> David
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> CCIE
> KID
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 2:22 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: MPLS over GRE
>
> Hi fellas,
>
> Why it is necessary to run MPLS over GRE. Is there any design consideration
> for running MPLS over GRE?.
> What is the purpose of it?
> My customer is running MPLS over GRE and i dont understand why they do so ?
> Is there any reason behind it ?
>
> --
> With Warmest Regards,
>
> CCIE KID
> CCIE#29992 (Security)
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- With Warmest Regards, CCIE KID CCIE#29992 (Security) Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Sun Feb 12 2012 - 13:08:41 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Mar 01 2012 - 11:46:56 ART