What you are seeing is Load balancing across multiple TE tunnels for
prefixes reachable further down the tunnel. This is an expected behavior
with "autoroute announce". You can use "auto-bw" to dynamically control the
TE tunnel Bandwidth after tunnel setup.
Once tunnels are established (using CSPF), IGP considers the Tunnels as
always 1-hop (and always prefers over any other IGP 1-hop path). You can
load balance upto 8,16, or 32 TE paths as supported by the platform.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Sonu Khandelwal <sonu.kwl_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> Sonu Khandelwal (
> sonu.kwl@gmail.com) is not on your Guest List<https://www.boxbe.com/approved-list>| Approve
> sender <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc=10557674166_204049186> | Approve
> domain <https://www.boxbe.com/anno?tc=10557674166_204049186&dom>
>
> on interface it means how much bandwidth can be reserved by RSVP.
> on tunnel it means, how much bandwidth is required by tunnel.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Thanks,
> Sonu
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:37 PM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Then what does "rsvp bandwidth <> " on interface does ?
> > That is also a constraint on interface to establish the tunnel .. right ?
> >
> > How do you differentiate between the BW that we specify on interface
> level
> > and the one that we specify on interface tunnel ?
> >
> > Thnx
> > Gaurav Madan
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Paul Negron <negron.paul_at_gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The bandwidth is a constraint. It only says " I need 60K of bandwidth
> in
> > > order to establish this tunnel". One tunnel requires 60K and the other
> > > requires 70K. If the bandwidth is available for both, they will both be
> > > established. That "bandwidth" constraint has nothing to do with the
> cost
> > of
> > > the tunnel for route selection.
> > > --
> > > Paul Negron
> > > CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752
> > > Senior Technical Instructor
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > From: GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>
> > > > Reply-To: GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177_at_gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:44:46 +0530
> > > > To: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
> > > > Subject: MPLS TE Tunnel : Tunnel B/W doubt
> > > >
> > > > Hi All
> > > >
> > > > I am running in some issue to understand how Tunnel Bandwidth works .
> > > >
> > > > Topology
> > > > ---------
> > > >
> > > > R1 R4
> > > > | |
> > > > | |
> > > > R2-----------------R3
> > > >
> > > > R1 is head end of tunnel . It has 2 tunnels Tunnel0 and Tunnel 1 as
> > > follows
> > > > :
> > > >
> > > > R1#sh run int tun 0
> > > > Building configuration...
> > > >
> > > > Current configuration : 284 bytes
> > > > !
> > > > interface Tunnel0
> > > > ip unnumbered Loopback0
> > > > tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
> > > > tunnel destination 4.4.4.4
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 7 7
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 70
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic lockdown
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > R1#sh run int tun 1
> > > > Building configuration...
> > > >
> > > > Current configuration : 284 bytes
> > > > !
> > > > interface Tunnel1
> > > > ip unnumbered Loopback0
> > > > tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
> > > > tunnel destination 4.4.4.4
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng autoroute announce
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng priority 7 7
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng bandwidth 60
> > > > tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 1 dynamic lockdown
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Now ; one tunnel has bandwidth of 70Kbps and other has of 60Kbps .
> > > > Following is my show ip route ospf output :
> > > >
> > > > 4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > > > O 4.4.4.4 [110/4] via 4.4.4.4, 00:05:52, Tunnel1
> > > > [110/4] via 4.4.4.4, 00:05:52, Tunnel0
> > > >
> > > > I see both entries there ...
> > > >
> > > > Is there a reason for this ?
> > > > Please let me know .. I think that it should be routing via Tunnel 0
> > > only .
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Gaurav Madan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > > >
> > > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jan 28 2012 - 11:02:47 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 11:52:52 ART