BGP also uses a similar method of keeping track of the OSPF info (Domain-ID,
Cost using the MED attribute, type of route). Look at the extended
information for OSPF like you did EIGRP.
ISIS should not be used to the edge and I know it used to leak routes in an
efficient way in the VPN in times past. Very inconsistent and sloppy. I know
they have cleaned some things up in code but I have not implemented ISIS to
the edge in any real scenario to verify.
Paul
-- Paul Negron CCIE# 14856 CCSI# 22752 Senior Technical Instructor > From: Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com> > Reply-To: Routing Freak <routingfreak_at_gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:22:42 +0530 > To: Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com> > Subject: MPLS L3 VPN query > > Hi all, > > I have a weird doubt when redistributing EIGRP or OSPF or ISIS into MPBGP > update to another PE and again MPBGP is redistributed into EIGRP or OSPF or > ISIS. > How does BGP carry EIGRP info or OSPF info or ISIS info such as ( Area for > OSPF, internal route or external route what is the area type or lsa type) > or for EIGRP ( AS number , Delay, BW). I know for EIGRP , there is extended > bgp communites attributes to carry for EIGRP .. ( which is > 8801,8802,8803,8804,8805) > > But wat about OSPF or ISIS into BGP ( how does BGP carry OSPF or ISIS > routes) ? Is there any extended community attributes for this? > > And also how does OSPF or ISIS carry BGP updates from one end to another > end ? Is there any extended TLVS for it or else is there any other > extended headers for OSPF or ISIS to carry BGP information. > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Jan 19 2012 - 10:54:42 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 02 2012 - 11:52:51 ART