Re: OT : CG-NAT

Hello team, good morning.

CGNAT has to tie into your IPv6 strategy as well ... probably best to put
out a RFP and talk long term strategy with the vendors. You have to make
sure the solution you choose will allow you to preserve what you have and
grow / adopt ... etc ...

Cisco and Juni are about all I know ... For the Cisco solution, this link
is quite helpful IMO ...

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6553/white_paper_c11-558744-00.html

For SBCs - if it is VoIP security, then Sipera by far the best (Sipera is
now now Avaya). ACME has the largest market share by far, a lot of
partners and interoperability, ... and so you probably need to consider
these folk as well.

HTH,
Andrew Lissitz, CCIE 31840

.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Rich Collins <nilsi2002_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Such as Session Border Controllers... then look at ACME packet
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Wicky <wicky0777_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Experts ,
> >
> > Need a little help on above mater ,There may be people in this forum who
> > has already implemented the Large Scale Nat using various vendor
> solutions
> > in Telcos .
> > For Carrier Grade - NAT Solution who will be the good Vendors exist ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Wicky
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net