Re: Reachability - Interfaces not included

Yeah, I hear you.
 
Tom- You live in Chicago, right? That means you're
headed to RTP?
 
Marc Abel and myself took it in San Jose a few weeks ago in
San Jose. I forgot the proctors exact name, but I think it was Tung. He was
VERY nice and VERY helpful to everyone in the lab. Tom, the prior stiff
proctor, has taken retirement. Long live SJC testing center!

Regards,
Jay
McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com/

Support
me in the MS150 Challenge!
http://main.nationalmssociety.org/site/TR/Bike/TXHBikeEvents?px=5886043&pg=pe
rsonal&fr_id=17896

________________________________
From: Aaron
<aaron1_at_gvtc.com>
To: 'Jay McMickle' <jay.mcmickle_at_yahoo.com>; 'marc abel'
<marcabel_at_gmail.com>; 'Tom Kacprzynski' <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
Cc: 'Cisco
certification' <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 3:51
PM
Subject: RE: Reachability - Interfaces not included

My walk to proctor was
only about 10 or 15.... too bad that didn't help
much... lol

Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jay
McMickle
Sent: Tuesday,
December 27, 2011 3:07 PM
To: marc abel; Tom Kacprzynski
Cc: Cisco
certification
Subject: Re: Reachability - Interfaces not included

Hey Tom,
I
usually infer from the drawing and verbage, and then ask the
proctor with your
feeling of what should be done.

I map the frame relay to
ping themselves
unless told not to. Scott Morris AoD's state to do the
opposite- map only if
asked. Again, another 40' walk to the Proctor should
answer that one, too.
Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, CCDP, MCSE
http://mycciepursuit.wordpress.com/

Support me in the MS150 Challenge!
http://main.nationalmssociety.org/site/TR/Bike/TXHBikeEvents?px=5886043&pg=p
e
rsonal&fr_id=17896

________________________________
From: marc abel
<marcabel_at_gmail.com>
To: Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco
certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 2:21
PM
Subject: Re: Reachability - Interfaces not included

I would ask the
proctor on that, I haven't seen much ambiguity in this
regard though.

Yes,
static map those frame interfaces.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tom
Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> During the test you are
asked to make sure to have full reachability. If
> there are interfaces you
were never asked to advertised internally or
> redistributed, what would you
do?
> 1. Leave them and don't include them as part of the full reachability
test
> 2. Redistribute them as connected.
> 3. Ask the proctor.
>
> On a
similar note what about Frame Relay directly connected interface,
> should
those have a static mapping so they could can be pinged locally or
> only if
they are specified in the task requirements?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Tom
>
>
>
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 27 2011 - 14:04:15 ART