Re: Static Mroute - allowed?

From: Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:59:06 -0500

 I disagree about making things too easy...

Like anything, you should be selective and not a 0/0! :) Asking the
proctor isn't a bad idea either...

But keep in mind your options:

1. Changing your IGP path (BAD, BAD idea)
2. Static mroute
3. MBGP multicast address family (while plausible, more likely outside
the scope/necessity of R&S lab)

Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP, et al.

CCSI #21903, JNCI-SP, JNCI-ER

swm_at_emanon.com

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

On 12/18/11 9:23 PM, Yuri Bank wrote:

  I feel like that would make a lot of multicast tasks too easy, and
  could be a dangerous assumption to make. I would DEFINITELY ask the
  proctor about this before going to town with static mroutes.

  -Yuri

  On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
  wrote:

    Tom,

    I totally agree with Scott. He is right on the money.

    On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Tom Kacprzynski <tom.kac_at_gmail.com>
    wrote:

> Thank you everyone for the quick responses. Now I can go mroute
    happy in my
> labs without worrying about it :)
>
> Tom
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com>
    wrote:
>
> > An mroute is not a route. It influences a lookup for a
    check.
> >
> > I'd be aware of a specific requirement for no static mroutes,
    but
> > otherwise, the two are unrelated.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
    Provider) #4713,
> >
> > CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER #102,
    CISSP, et al.
> >
> > CCSI #21903, JNCI-SP, JNCI-ER
> >
> > swm_at_emanon.com
> >
> >
> > Knowledge is power.
> >
> > Power corrupts.
> >
> > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
> >
> >
> > On 12/18/11 2:10 PM, Tom Kacprzynski wrote:
> > > Hello
> > > On the lab test, in the original lab restriction, is a
    mroute static
> > route
> > > allowed if they say no static routes ? Or are they only
    referencing
> > *unicast
> > > *static routes with such a statement?
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >
> > >
    _______________________________________________________________________
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
    _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
    _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

    --
    *Narbik Kocharians
    *CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
    *www.MicronicsTraining.com* <http://www.micronicstraining.com/>
    Sr. Technical Instructor
    YES! We take Cisco Learning Credits!
    Training & Remote Racks available

    Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

    _______________________________________________________________________
    Subscription information may be found at:
    http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 21:59:06 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jan 01 2012 - 08:27:00 ART