Re: Static Mroute - allowed?

Thank you everyone for the quick responses. Now I can go mroute happy in my
labs without worrying about it :)

Tom

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:

> An mroute is not a route. It influences a lookup for a check.
>
> I'd be aware of a specific requirement for no static mroutes, but
> otherwise, the two are unrelated.
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> CCDE #2009::D, CCNP-Voice, JNCIE-SP #153, JNCIE-ER #102, CISSP, et al.
>
> CCSI #21903, JNCI-SP, JNCI-ER
>
> swm_at_emanon.com
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
> On 12/18/11 2:10 PM, Tom Kacprzynski wrote:
> > Hello
> > On the lab test, in the original lab restriction, is a mroute static
> route
> > allowed if they say no static routes ? Or are they only referencing
> *unicast
> > *static routes with such a statement?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 13:25:23 ART